Let us imagine, it would have once been a long time a religion that was called "the good". Its followers called themselves "the good guys" and the founder of this religion was "the best" venerated. It was a religion for those who taught no one excluded, and love to the origin and all creatures.
the beginning was - as in any love - all easily. Everyone who heard about this religion, felt the inner Angerührtsein, touching the heart and felt from within the inspiration to turn even the good, to be a good one. Who wants to not be good? Who does not believe that he is good and who does not believe in the good? In any case, no one who is reasonably normal.
followed that with those who for some unknown reasons did not want to belong to the good, something was wrong. It could really only be because that they have the religion the good had not been properly informed. Or - they were evil! That the wicked were really bad maybe you could tell from the fact that they said that the good is not good, but in truth evil. How could you say something absurd?
As the good under consideration because of belonging to the good as well and not because of goodness, was the dichotomy of those who just did not belong to it.
The good you felt well off and the other actually secretly threatened and questioned. Some spoke openly about the good that they are actually insecure and therefore need the distance. The distinction gave them their identity as the Good.
have the non-good, of course observed that the external form of ritualized good effectively concealed the true essence - and that these dynamics are deterred and they looked at the whole spectacle than an ordinary dysfunctional power structure, but this was transfigured divine. The good interpreted their reservations to join the good guys, as a sign that they were not good.
Since then the good guys had their own religion and the "good guys" called, there were the bad guys. As befits the evil that it had to be fought or somehow forced to turn back. The resistors were seen as harbingers of doom.
The evil group also included those who had previously called himself was once good. And although they understood each other as they called for before such and also, they were for the "good" but actually bad, because they had some doubts about the overall package of faith of the good guys. Their doubts and objections was no one really, since you were now become evil and are easy to avoid. It would also have to be cracks in the belief system and there would perhaps become even an evil one.
converted more and more people now for the better. The best got a call that made its name. The death of the best picked it now in the domain of absolute perfectness and all that had done the best and spoken, was recommended for the maxim and to imitate. Only the bad guys felt this cult as überidealisiert and not quite truthfully. For them it was a religious inflation, in which the inner guide is moved too much to outside.
That was good even without the direct action of the best such a success, confirmed the good is to truly be the good guys. Only the good can really have such a success, but the truth is successful. Sometime in the not too distant future, the good would prevail all over the world and all people would be made good ...
were
But as more and more people the better, it started to not always want all the same good and some began to say to, they knew what was good among all the very best. But why they thought it the better, they did say rare. And if they knew how to say it, it did not sound convincing. There were conferences and councils, was established in what is good, but also countless schisms and factions, under the good simply understood something else.
In this infinite confusion of opinions, most did not even know what they should now be regarded as good. In the tangle of opinions and counter opinions did not even most, what they should believe now. The amazing thing was that all claims to know the really good and the correct interpretation of the good to have.
order to justify his view and reaffirm claimed that at some point one that the other reviews were not good at all, but basically already angry. The place now so reviled myself pretty good evil: who said of the good guys, they are evil, no good could be more, so it was itself an evil.
The good, although they believed in the goodness knew, now no longer what was good. While each individual good was still convinced that he knew, but when he starts with another talked about and exchanged, he realized that they could find something else for a huge confusion.
The people who simple do-gooder was very innocent in these matters, since they are so good served as a support for their life. He believed all naive when they assured him only that it was so good and so is. That was the time when it was pretty bad to the good.
This embarrassing, the good and the idea of the good as detrimental to the state was better among the good guys of course have noticed for some time. They meditated for a solution. They understood: It does not help to discuss what is the better and the worse the best. Each believes the best arguments for his vision to have.
If we want to preserve the religion of the good, we must find another way to determine the good. So she pondered on the best. If we seek to imitate him, we can not go wrong. For no one can seriously argue that he himself would know better than the best. The good thing was fixed, therefore, is what has done the best and spoken - and nothing else.
then gathered all the good guys, what they knew of the best. They checked whether the messages were credible and who she had taught. They put on investigations into the credibility of the transmitter. They collected and gathered, and when she made enough the life of the best had brought to light, they decided it was enough, and ordered all to thick books. Way, it could the good, to define the good and lay down for good. And from then on they did everything exactly as they thought they had found that it had also done the best that way.
Under the guise of a good thing now happened too many bad things really were only self-interest. And many former Good could not and would no longer belong to the good. Since they declared the leader of the good for charlatans, they are classified as evil. In this ancient rivalry is kept those coming from the perspective of the good the bad were still good and even better than the good.
you watch, what did the good guys, relying on the best and found to be good, would have no one, not even a good one done, or enjoyed, had it not done supposedly the best. The good guys did so because the best things that never were good. Just because he had done. Could what was unjust, being good just because it had done the best as well? was
course it is also serious minds, where it was really good and nothing else
The good ones believed deeply in fact not really know it and if they believed they were acting not after. In the end, they made always what they used to do and what they took advantage, no matter whether it was good or just or true or not. Since many believed
really good to be in sole possession of the good, of course, this legitimized the forced conversion of the wicked. This dark historicity of good left many people leave the good guys and be on the search for her own good. The theme of the good has been privatized, and each began to have its own patchwork version of the good.
This story is endless. Those looking for sincere truth behind the talk, she leaves. They recognize that the most important thing is the good, the goodness, the principle of good and it does not have much in common with what did the good and the bad guys fought.
"If your knowledge of power has emerged from the thick forest of delusion, you will become indifferent to everything that has been heard and what is yet to hear (about this world and the next).
If reason is no longer confused by the scriptures (of the various interpretations), and undeterred in deep meditation (samadhi) remains bewegnungslos, only then will you yoga (the relationship with Krishna) gain. "Bhagavad Gita 2.52-53
0 comments:
Post a Comment