(This is an excerpt from a short video animation, which I have just produced who would like to have this, can they get with us. Ananda dham, CP40, 6656 Golino, Switzerland)
in humans lies a Ursehnsucht that triumph over their victims not the perpetrators. The longing for justice is deep in us - and we must not skip.
indifference to the suffering of others is stupidity. How can one be closed to the suffering cry of our brothers and sisters in the animal world? That would be something threatening irresponsibility.
It is irrelevant what kind of core values we speak. The point is what we live. Eating meat is a direct order for the destruction of life.
The Bible tells of fratricide in Genesis. When God Cain to account and asks him: "Where is your brother Abel," Cain replied. "I do not know" (Gen. 4.9)
Cain denies responsibility for his doing but the results to the fact that he has his life umerherwandern with existential anxiety.
animals are either beloved pets and stuffed animals or simply disappear into an anonymous mass, we can then kill and eat on the plate.
This irrationality in the treatment of animals means that some animals can be humanized and to compensate for a lack of social relations and on the other animals instumentalisiert for self-interest. Purpose palate and other self-interests, they are de-individualized.
man has convinced himself to be the crown of creation. Rather than accept this responsibility with compassion and blessings, we are exploiters and become life- a world view that one can believe that all other creatures were created merely to provide food and furs to the man to be tortured and exterminated. It speaks to the animals at random from their own existence purpose.
When we talk about the relationship of man to his fellow creatures, the animals, think, take exercise to an alarming extent that our society is founded on institutionalized violence against animals.
We are with the other creatures of this earth in the war. Everywhere the human imperialism has enslaved the animal nations, oppressed, murdered and mutilated. All around us are the slaves and Extermination camps, we have built for our fellow creatures: breeding factories and slaughter houses - Dachau and Buchenwald for the defeated species.
The habitual is comfortable. The question of conscience, however, is: Is it fair?
all that the animal can, it must also. The man may be many things he can not.
From the book by Peter Longerich, "'which we knew nothing' The Germans and the Holocaust 1933 - 1945":..
were "Women in fainting or weeping men covered their faces and turned away their heads as the civilians repeatedly shouted, `We have not known anything we have known nothing`! came the ex-prisoners beside himself with rage. `You have known it ', they cried. `We were working next to you in the factories. We have told you, while risking our lives. But you have done nothing. '"A significant number of people knew about the Holocaust. For the deportations occurred (...)'s not in the dark of night, but openly, in broad daylight. And they were accompanied by comments in the press, which no doubt left out what fate awaited the deportees (...). " Exactly like today with animals! Even today we see every day on the highway the Schlachttiertranporten. And today is regularly reported in the newspapers. And even today, do people know nothing about it. What exactly is the appropriate, the morally correct response to individual collective injustice that surrounds us? In relation to the Nazi period is the 85th publisher Maria Sommer following response: ". Everyone is guilty of not was in the opposition" (Time Life magazine, 29, 2007, p. 44 f.) From any active opposition to demand, is perhaps too much requires, at least if we mean things that are likely to bring a conflict with the law, however, can require you to bringen.Was to all cases is that someone is not consciously and actively in these crimes INVOLVED! exactly what but any meat eater. In view of present knowledge about, what happens to the animals before they land on our plate, and given the wide range of vegetarian foods, is who today still eat meat, not followers but complicity.
is now a new and particularly dangerous generation of meat-eaters grew up, which is aware of the cruelty and ethical abstrusity of killing for the palate fully aware this is still legitimate, holds that there are only animals - and therefore available to our interests.
This new generation eats healthy, natural and deliberately. They argue that they see themselves as part of a larger whole, where the "food and being eaten "irresistible. This diffuse naturalness folklore the killing of animals mutated almost to the service of creation. Anyone of such" provided close to nature "and" conscious "with meat, then locks almost back actively into natural events. The animal nothing that it should not -... the man very much in humans, there are no absolutely necessary behaviors he has to decide
It is this creature, which is increasingly regarded as the crown of creation, his lust murder is justified by a natural necessity, . which is not
The urgent request of the calf to you is this: "Let us live - feeding up vegetarian "
0 comments:
Post a Comment