desire for uniqueness
In the face of terror
Knowledge of one's own mortality triggers an existential anxiety, an inner terror. All the things you do in life with a lot of effort and effort is ultimately futile. This futility man feels as degrading.
Man suspect it already as Child knows and then later that he will die. This makes it the fearful, terrifying back before the death of animals. To
right to come to, creates a man-made slip-sense and adopt this order, meaning and an imaginary permanence that goes beyond one's own life and gives you a sense of immortality. not from the wish to the physical end wiped out as irrelevant to his, seeking a man then to stay with others in memory - attempts mostly by the idea of his own family, by social and scientific achievements, revolutionary ideas, works of art or one , with a religious faith an eternal to save lives.
This creates a self-esteem, which allows one to experience his life as meaningful and considered. We will not without a sense lived on this planet to have worked, suffered, died for nothing here.
The desire for distinction and uniqueness can already see the sibling rivalry, the battle for greater piece of chocolate or about to be the first to be somewhere. Children are not cancerous, but they represent quite openly the tragic fate of mankind. The man desperately struggling to assert itself in the cosmos as something unique to be a hero, so it counts more than any other thing. The child's Rivalry will be to win the adults to a duel, a conflict, the greatest attention. Man Moeche by external circumstances role for society, guaranteed by a state in the transitory world to value and safety.
vulnerability
The young child is helpless in a situation. It lurks everywhere around the chaos. The scares, which intensified when it experienced its physical vulnerability or death of parents, siblings or just a pet. The fear of death is reflected in the fear down for life. The outside world is experienced hostile, so the child safety and seeking protection. This need for protection, it transmits it to the protection of persons who thus become powerful figures, but able to banish the forces of chaos. This transfer serves as a taming of terror.
This has of course the price of a new terror: the fear of loss of the object that helps one to conquer death. To obtain this protection, the child must be the object of protection (parents, God) to adapt through self control, avoid disapproval and earn the love and attention.
The positive reaction of the company and the parent gives the child the feeling to be of importance. The result is conformity and adaptation.
religion as understood in the world makes, regardless of human standards, to please the adaptation urge other people, but the moral religiosity transfers the concept then immediately afterwards, like the source of creation to do. Then grows rapidly approaching an anxiety to please the ever-present to God and his demands to fulfill. The
is an inevitable paradox: on the one hand, the desire for uniqueness and to overcome all handicaps, on the other hand the need for adaptation, recognition by the social environment and compliance.
passive and active heroism
to be working in the larger whole, be used with the All, to live in a cosmic connection, increases one's own being and gives the people a sense of a transcendent, immortal value. This is an attempt to escape the mortality rate - a passive heroism.
On the other hand, would open man anywhere, but be unique and unmistakable, to fulfill his desire for immortality through unique services. It drives the people then, from nature to stand and to dominate - an active heroism.
The passive heroism stands for loneliness, but out of the active heroism in the insulation because it is a "mortal immortality," which the fruits performance and track formation are able to communicate within the world. Even if what you want happens it loses still more important over time and is forgotten.
transcendental uniqueness
The eternal soul is unique and we already need no longer distinguish themselves artificially. It has not a value in God and must be by location, family activity or ascribe a value. Man is loved without having to behave in a certain way in order to earn the love of God.
religion gives the realization that it is impossible to form within their own human condition, something absolute. That would be the compensation of the Agape motif into the Temporary into it. The cosmic heroism, faith and God called the people from his death relieves anxiety, because he understands that for him as an eternal being no death and there has never existed. Thus he is freed from the need and can now only really use his life as a gift to God - be released from the threat of existential anxiety in the neck.
Friday, July 25, 2008
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
Phiten Necklace Way Of Shorten It
Urgent Request of calf
(This is an excerpt from a short video animation, which I have just produced who would like to have this, can they get with us. Ananda dham, CP40, 6656 Golino, Switzerland)
in humans lies a Ursehnsucht that triumph over their victims not the perpetrators. The longing for justice is deep in us - and we must not skip.
indifference to the suffering of others is stupidity. How can one be closed to the suffering cry of our brothers and sisters in the animal world? That would be something threatening irresponsibility.
It is irrelevant what kind of core values we speak. The point is what we live. Eating meat is a direct order for the destruction of life.
The Bible tells of fratricide in Genesis. When God Cain to account and asks him: "Where is your brother Abel," Cain replied. "I do not know" (Gen. 4.9)
Cain denies responsibility for his doing but the results to the fact that he has his life umerherwandern with existential anxiety.
animals are either beloved pets and stuffed animals or simply disappear into an anonymous mass, we can then kill and eat on the plate.
This irrationality in the treatment of animals means that some animals can be humanized and to compensate for a lack of social relations and on the other animals instumentalisiert for self-interest. Purpose palate and other self-interests, they are de-individualized.
man has convinced himself to be the crown of creation. Rather than accept this responsibility with compassion and blessings, we are exploiters and become life- a world view that one can believe that all other creatures were created merely to provide food and furs to the man to be tortured and exterminated. It speaks to the animals at random from their own existence purpose.
When we talk about the relationship of man to his fellow creatures, the animals, think, take exercise to an alarming extent that our society is founded on institutionalized violence against animals.
We are with the other creatures of this earth in the war. Everywhere the human imperialism has enslaved the animal nations, oppressed, murdered and mutilated. All around us are the slaves and Extermination camps, we have built for our fellow creatures: breeding factories and slaughter houses - Dachau and Buchenwald for the defeated species.
The habitual is comfortable. The question of conscience, however, is: Is it fair?
all that the animal can, it must also. The man may be many things he can not.
From the book by Peter Longerich, "'which we knew nothing' The Germans and the Holocaust 1933 - 1945":..
were "Women in fainting or weeping men covered their faces and turned away their heads as the civilians repeatedly shouted, `We have not known anything we have known nothing`! came the ex-prisoners beside himself with rage. `You have known it ', they cried. `We were working next to you in the factories. We have told you, while risking our lives. But you have done nothing. '"A significant number of people knew about the Holocaust. For the deportations occurred (...)'s not in the dark of night, but openly, in broad daylight. And they were accompanied by comments in the press, which no doubt left out what fate awaited the deportees (...). " Exactly like today with animals! Even today we see every day on the highway the Schlachttiertranporten. And today is regularly reported in the newspapers. And even today, do people know nothing about it. What exactly is the appropriate, the morally correct response to individual collective injustice that surrounds us? In relation to the Nazi period is the 85th publisher Maria Sommer following response: ". Everyone is guilty of not was in the opposition" (Time Life magazine, 29, 2007, p. 44 f.) From any active opposition to demand, is perhaps too much requires, at least if we mean things that are likely to bring a conflict with the law, however, can require you to bringen.Was to all cases is that someone is not consciously and actively in these crimes INVOLVED! exactly what but any meat eater. In view of present knowledge about, what happens to the animals before they land on our plate, and given the wide range of vegetarian foods, is who today still eat meat, not followers but complicity.
is now a new and particularly dangerous generation of meat-eaters grew up, which is aware of the cruelty and ethical abstrusity of killing for the palate fully aware this is still legitimate, holds that there are only animals - and therefore available to our interests.
This new generation eats healthy, natural and deliberately. They argue that they see themselves as part of a larger whole, where the "food and being eaten "irresistible. This diffuse naturalness folklore the killing of animals mutated almost to the service of creation. Anyone of such" provided close to nature "and" conscious "with meat, then locks almost back actively into natural events. The animal nothing that it should not -... the man very much in humans, there are no absolutely necessary behaviors he has to decide
It is this creature, which is increasingly regarded as the crown of creation, his lust murder is justified by a natural necessity, . which is not
The urgent request of the calf to you is this: "Let us live - feeding up vegetarian "
(This is an excerpt from a short video animation, which I have just produced who would like to have this, can they get with us. Ananda dham, CP40, 6656 Golino, Switzerland)
in humans lies a Ursehnsucht that triumph over their victims not the perpetrators. The longing for justice is deep in us - and we must not skip.
indifference to the suffering of others is stupidity. How can one be closed to the suffering cry of our brothers and sisters in the animal world? That would be something threatening irresponsibility.
It is irrelevant what kind of core values we speak. The point is what we live. Eating meat is a direct order for the destruction of life.
The Bible tells of fratricide in Genesis. When God Cain to account and asks him: "Where is your brother Abel," Cain replied. "I do not know" (Gen. 4.9)
Cain denies responsibility for his doing but the results to the fact that he has his life umerherwandern with existential anxiety.
animals are either beloved pets and stuffed animals or simply disappear into an anonymous mass, we can then kill and eat on the plate.
This irrationality in the treatment of animals means that some animals can be humanized and to compensate for a lack of social relations and on the other animals instumentalisiert for self-interest. Purpose palate and other self-interests, they are de-individualized.
man has convinced himself to be the crown of creation. Rather than accept this responsibility with compassion and blessings, we are exploiters and become life- a world view that one can believe that all other creatures were created merely to provide food and furs to the man to be tortured and exterminated. It speaks to the animals at random from their own existence purpose.
When we talk about the relationship of man to his fellow creatures, the animals, think, take exercise to an alarming extent that our society is founded on institutionalized violence against animals.
We are with the other creatures of this earth in the war. Everywhere the human imperialism has enslaved the animal nations, oppressed, murdered and mutilated. All around us are the slaves and Extermination camps, we have built for our fellow creatures: breeding factories and slaughter houses - Dachau and Buchenwald for the defeated species.
The habitual is comfortable. The question of conscience, however, is: Is it fair?
all that the animal can, it must also. The man may be many things he can not.
From the book by Peter Longerich, "'which we knew nothing' The Germans and the Holocaust 1933 - 1945":..
were "Women in fainting or weeping men covered their faces and turned away their heads as the civilians repeatedly shouted, `We have not known anything we have known nothing`! came the ex-prisoners beside himself with rage. `You have known it ', they cried. `We were working next to you in the factories. We have told you, while risking our lives. But you have done nothing. '"A significant number of people knew about the Holocaust. For the deportations occurred (...)'s not in the dark of night, but openly, in broad daylight. And they were accompanied by comments in the press, which no doubt left out what fate awaited the deportees (...). " Exactly like today with animals! Even today we see every day on the highway the Schlachttiertranporten. And today is regularly reported in the newspapers. And even today, do people know nothing about it. What exactly is the appropriate, the morally correct response to individual collective injustice that surrounds us? In relation to the Nazi period is the 85th publisher Maria Sommer following response: ". Everyone is guilty of not was in the opposition" (Time Life magazine, 29, 2007, p. 44 f.) From any active opposition to demand, is perhaps too much requires, at least if we mean things that are likely to bring a conflict with the law, however, can require you to bringen.Was to all cases is that someone is not consciously and actively in these crimes INVOLVED! exactly what but any meat eater. In view of present knowledge about, what happens to the animals before they land on our plate, and given the wide range of vegetarian foods, is who today still eat meat, not followers but complicity.
is now a new and particularly dangerous generation of meat-eaters grew up, which is aware of the cruelty and ethical abstrusity of killing for the palate fully aware this is still legitimate, holds that there are only animals - and therefore available to our interests.
This new generation eats healthy, natural and deliberately. They argue that they see themselves as part of a larger whole, where the "food and being eaten "irresistible. This diffuse naturalness folklore the killing of animals mutated almost to the service of creation. Anyone of such" provided close to nature "and" conscious "with meat, then locks almost back actively into natural events. The animal nothing that it should not -... the man very much in humans, there are no absolutely necessary behaviors he has to decide
It is this creature, which is increasingly regarded as the crown of creation, his lust murder is justified by a natural necessity, . which is not
The urgent request of the calf to you is this: "Let us live - feeding up vegetarian "
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)